GuLoader: A fileless shellcode based malware in action

A good thief steals without leaving any footprint behind, the similar job is done by file less malware in the threat world.  Additionally if a file less malware getting the work done without involving Potable Executable (PE) file, not even in the memory is like ‘icing on the cake’. GuLoader is a file less shellcode based malware, recently observed by SonicWall threat research team.  A VBS script inside an archive file is delivered to the victim’s machine as an email attachment which loads GuLoader shellcode into PowerShell executable. GuLoader further downloads and executes other malware in the  memory of a legitimate process:

Infection Cycle:

VBSCRIPT

The obfuscated VBScript contains code broken into variables which is concatenated on execution. The VBScript stores the shellcode into registry entry HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Fordyred6 which varies across the variants. A PowerShell script is then executed to read the registry value and continue the infection process:

PowerShell Script

The PowerShell script allocates memory into powershell.exe using API ZwAllocateVirtualMemory and reads the shellcode data from the registry entry. The shellcode is copied into allocated memory using RtlMoveMemory and executed inside powershell.exe:

Shellcode

An error window saying “This program cannot be run under virtual environment or debugging software!” can be seen on execution of the shellcode in a controlled environment. While analyzing the shellcode, a malware researcher should be habitual of seeing this window again and again, because the shellcode is full of anti debug and anti VM techniques:

 

Initial 0x41 bytes of the shellcode works as decryptor bytes for the remaining shellcode. The decryption is done using a XOR operation with a constant value:

 

After decrypting the remaining shellcode, the decryptor code ( initial 0x41 bytes) are replaced with 0x90 (NOP instruction) and control is transferred to the decrypted shellcode:

 

The shellcode uses PEB traversal method to get the API addresses by comparing API names with its own list of hashes. The malware uses custom DJB2 hashing algorithm to avoid detection from various security software. If custom DJB2 algorithm is not used, DJB2 hashes of the various APIs would be same across the malware variants which makes the detection pretty easy for the security software:

 

 

The malware involves various anti debug and anti VM techniques. It keeps all the strings encrypted which are decrypted and used on demand basis. It encrypts the code before calling the API and decrypts it back after calling the API.

Strings Decryption

The malware keeps the string encrypted which are being decrypted just before using them. The malware keeps a DWORD value before encrypted string, which is XOR with a constant value to get the string size. The malware contains a decryption key of size 0x2B bytes which is used to decrypt the encrypted strings using XOR operation:

Anti API Hook

The malware traverses the ntdll.dll memory starting from the code section and looks for bytes [0xb8, 0x00, ??, ??, 0xBA] to get the code responsible for making the system calls. These system calls are hooked by many security software to change the control flow to the their code for investigating the API calls. If the system calls code is patched, the malware restores them back to the original bytes:

Anti Dump

The malware encrypts the shellcode just before calling any API, to prevent event based memory dumps or analysis. After the API is called shellcode is decrypted back:

 

Anti Debug

 

Software Breakpoints

The malware checks for software breakpoints before calling the API by comparing initial bytes of the API with 0xCC (INT3) and initial word with 0x03CD (INT 3) and 0x0B0F (UD2). If any of these breakpoint instructions is found, the malware shows the error window message mentioned in the beginning and terminates the execution:

 

Vectored Exception Handler

The malware registers vectored exception handler with malware defined callback module which checks for INT3 (0xCC) exception and computes the next Extended Instruction Pointer (EIP) address by XOR the next byte of current EIP, to continue after the exception. The INT3 instruction is handled by the debugger which misleads the control flow to incorrect execution path:

 

However adding this vectored exception handler is an anti debugging technique, moreover in this malware this can be named as irritating technique for a researchers, because the code is full of INT3 instructions along with opaque predicate and arithmetic calculations. The researcher needs to either bypass the instruction by calculating the next EIP which will make him tired, or he needs to write a plugin code to bypass the instruction, which is again time consuming:

 

KUSER_SHARED_DATA

Similar to user mode GetTickCount API, kernel mode ZwGetTickCount reads values from the KUSER_SHARED_DATA page. This page is mapped read-only into the user mode at address 0x7FFE0000. The malware reads the values directly from KUSER_SHARED_DATA before and after executing some instructions and calculates the difference. The difference is calculated multiple times and added to a variable which is compared to the threshold value to check for debugging environment. If the computed value does not meet the threshold condition it will continue the execution in a infinite loop:

 

DbgBreakPoint

The malware modified the memory protection to ntdll.dll to  PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE  using ZwProtectVirtualMemory API and replaces INT3 instruction with NOP instruction inside DbgBreakPoint API to disallow attaching debugger:

 

DbgUiRemoteBreakin

The malware replaces code inside DbgUiRemoteBreakin to invoke ExitProcess API with exit code 0:

 

ThreadHideFromDebugger

The malware invokes ZwSetInformationThread API by setting ThreadInformationClass argument as ThreadHideFromDebugger which detaches the debugger and terminates the process immediately, if running under a debugger:

 

Anti VM

The malware gets the virtual memory using API ZwQueryVirtualMemory and searches for string “vmtoolsdControlWndClass” and if finds the string, the malware considers the execution in controlled environment. If malware finds any evidence of running under virtual environment, it shows the error message window and terminates the execution:

 

CPUID

The malware executes the CPUID instruction with EAX = 1 (to get processor features) as input and examines result value in ECX register. If the 31st bit is of the ECX register is set, the malware considers the execution inside the Virtual Machine (VM):

QEMU Emulator

The malware checks for the presence of files related to QEMU emulator:

  • C:\Program Files\Qemu-ga\qemu-ga.exe
  • C:\Program Files\qga\qga.exe

Enumerate Windows

The malware enumerates windows using EnumWindows API and checks the windows count, if count is less then 0xC then the malware considers the execution in controlled environment:

 

Enumerate Device Drivers

The malware retrieves load addresses of the device drivers using API EnumDeviceDrivers and gets the name associates with each load address using API  GetDeviceDriverBaseNameA . The malware computes custom DJB2 hash value of device driver names and compares them with its list of hashes:

  • D82B79F9
  • 72FCC347
  • 55C69E11 (vmmouse.sys)
  • 6538B8EE (vmusbmouse.sys)
  • 907D9998
  • 83277DEB (vm3dmp.sys)

 

Enumerate Installed Software

The malware enumerates installed products using MsiEnumProductsA API and retrieves the product name using API MsiGetProductInfoA. The malware computes custom DJB2 hash value of product names and compares them with its list of hashes:

  • 30565F59
  • E5AB7D36
  • 4F3EA1F6
  • 27D195CB

 

Enumerate Services

The malware opens specified service control manager database using API OpenSCManagerA and retrieves the service names using API EnumServicesStatusA. The malware computes custom DJB2 hash value of service names and compares them with its list of hashes:

  • C99647C9
  • ACBC4B26 (VMware Tools)
  • F1D665FC (VMware Snapshot Provider)
  • 82D0D13B
  • 1605A96C
  • CE8609AB
  • 9D86D771

 

Debug Port

The malware invokes API ZwQueryInformationProcess with parameters ProcessInformationClass as ProcessDebugPort. If the API call succeeded, the malware considers the execution under the debugger:

 

Code Injection

The malware creates process “C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\caspol.exe” in CREATE_SUSPENDED mode. The malware creates a section and tries to map the section into the suspended process at 0x400000 but it failed with 0x40000003 (STATUS_IMAGE_NOT_AT_BASE). The malware allocates virtual memory into the suspended process using API ZwAllocateVirtualMemory.

 

The malware writes the shellcode bytes (0x8D000) into the suspended process using API ZwWriteVirtualMemory:

 

The malware modifies the EIP of the suspended process from its entrypoint to the injected shellcode using API ZwSetContextThread:

 

The malware resumes the suspended process using API ZwResumeThread. The shellcode again starts from the beginning but in the context of a new process. The shellcode again executes all the anti debug and anti VM techniques but this time additionally it also downloads the payload data:

 

The malware downloads encrypted payload from URL h[t][t]ps://onedrive.live.com/download?cid=5E3278A18A104B1A&resid=5E3278A18A104B1A%21117&authkey=ABLIkl0zjTxzpTk by setting user agent as “Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko”. The malware downloads in a loop, 0x10000 bytes each time using InternetReadFile until the complete payload data is downloaded:

Downloaded data contains 0x40 garbage bytes in the beginning. Instead of keeping hardcoded decryption key, malware computes the key after downloading the encrypted data. The malware contains a constant byte array of 0x30b size. The malware executes in a loop, picks the first word from the constant byte array XOR it with loop index and again XOR it with the word after 0x40 garbage bytes in the downloaded data and if the value comes to “4D5A”, the malware breaks the loop. Now the loop index is XOR with the constant byte array to get 0x30B bytes decryption key:

 

The malware decrypts the payload data using the decryption key, which is the NanoCore RAT for this variant. However the other variants also downloads AgentTesla, NetWire RAT and Ramcos RAT etc.:

 

The file is detected by only a few security vendors on popular threat intelligence sharing portal VirusTotal at the time of writing this blog, this indicates its spreading potential:

 

Evidence of the detection by RTDMI(tm) engine can be seen below in the Capture ATP report for this file:

Cybersecurity News & Trends

Curated stories about cybersecurity news and trends from major news outlets, trade pubs and infosec bloggers.

SonicWall finishes an intense week with news articles citing the 2022 Cyber Threat Report, a quote from Bill Conner, and articles written by our frontline cybersecurity experts. From industry news, we have three big reads. One is about the day the Internet died a few hours earlier in the week, compiled from posts by Computer WorldBleeping Computer, and ZDNet. From Bleeping Computer, we learned that Conti was busy with the ARMattack campaign, ransoming 40 organizations in only one month. Finally, from Dark Reading and CSO Online, according to researchers, there are 56 vulnerabilities in operational technology products used in everything from factories to hospitals. Is our technology insecure by design?

Remember, cybersecurity is everyone’s business. Be safe out there!

SonicWall News

Best Practices for Protecting Against Phishing, Ransomware and Email Fraud

CXOtoday (India), SonicWall Byline: Security teams and the organizations they support live in difficult times: they increasingly are the targets of sophisticated threats developed by a shadowy and very well financed cybercrime industry that has demonstrated it can often outsmart even the most robust security defenses.

Dicker Data, Hitech Support, Next Telecom, Datacom score SonicWall Honors

CRN (Australia), SonicWall News: “SonicWall has awarded Australian partners Dicker Data, Hitech Support, Next Telecom, Datacom System and Dell Australia for their work at its Asia-Pacific Partner Awards for the 2022 financial year.”

What is a Cyberattack? Types and Defenses

eSecurity Planet, SonicWall Threat Report Mention: Driven by the global pandemic, the increase in remote and hybrid work, and unprepared network defenses, cyberattacks have been rising exponentially. The 2022 SonicWall Cyber Threat Report found that all types of cyberattacks increased in 2021. Encrypted threats spiked 167%, ransomware increased 105%, and 5.4 billion malware attacks were identified by the report.

Ransomware, the Cyberattack that Set Off Alarms in Latin America

Forbes Colombia, SonicWall Threat Report Mention: The Cyber Threat Report 2022 of the US firm SonicWall, shows a rebound of 105% in data hijacking last year, surpassing 623 million attacks worldwide – almost twenty attempts per second – with the United States in the lead (421 million or 67.5% of the total).

Buy Access to a Company’s Data on the Dark Web for Less Than The Cost of a MacBook

Tech Radar Pro, Bill Conner Quote: “Ransomware attacks have simply exploded last year. Recent figures from SonicWall recorded more than 600 million ransomware attacks took place across the world in 2021, representing an increase of 105% compared to the year before. Compared to 2019, the figures are even worse, showing a rise of 232%. Cyberattacks become more attractive and potentially more disastrous as dependence on information technology increases,” said SonicWall President and CEO Bill Conner.

Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine Elevates Cybersecurity Concerns for Emerging Markets

Oxford Business Group, Threat Report Mention: According to security vendor SonicWall, ransomware attacks were up 105% in 2021, including a 1885% increase in attacks on government agencies, 755% in the health care sector, 152% in education and 21% in retail.

Fortinet vs. SonicWall: Enterprise Wireless LAN Comparison

Enterprise Networking Planet, Product Comparison: Fortinet and SonicWall are both well regarded enterprise wireless LAN vendors. This article will help you decide which solution is best for your business.

Detecting the Silent Cryptojacking Parasite to Remain Disease-free

Teiss, Published Byline: Immanuel Chavoya at SonicWall describes the dangers of cryptojacking, a damaging and parasitical use of an organization’s computer resources.

Digital Infrastructure Becomes Pivotal for Businesses and Personal Lives

Markers (APAC), SonicWall Executive Interview: Digital transformation is disrupting businesses across the globe as digital infrastructure becomes pivotal for the success and survival post-Covid-19. Over the years since the pandemic hit, we have witnessed a huge surge in digital platforms and tools used in business operations which in turn has increased the risk of cyberattacks. At this junction, the role of next-gen cyber security solution provider plays a significant role. Here is an interview with Debasish Mukherjee, Vice President, Regional Sales, APJ at SonicWall sharing his views on the cybersecurity market post-pandemic, threats to businesses, key cybersecurity recommendations, and how SonicWall can help organizations overcome these challenges.

Industry News

Half of the Internet died earlier this week

Compiled from Multiple Sources: A server outage at Cloudflare’s servers led to many websites and services going down. The resulting blackout affected significant services like Google, AWS and Twitter. Although the online security company quickly identified and fixed the problem (the service was down for a few minutes), it created a flurry of worry and spun up rumors about the cause.

Initially, we were all left in the dark about the nature of the blackout, which was even more worrisome as ComputerWorld reported major disruptions to large areas. Customers trying to access Cloudflare-supported websites experienced ‘500 errors’ (Internal server errors) for approximately two hours before the service was restored around 9 am GMT.

Bleeping Computer reported that the event was reminiscent of another outage when Cloudflare stopped a 26 million request-per-second DDoS attack, which was the most severe ever recorded. The record-breaking attack, which occurred last week, targeted one of Cloudflare’s customers using the Free plan. Experts speculated that the threat actor behind the attack used stolen servers and virtual machines, as it originated from Cloud Service Providers rather than weaker IoT devices from compromised Residential Internet Service Providers.

ZDNet updated the story with a Cloudflare apology that blamed the outage THIS week on a configuration error during a “routine” network upgrade.

Conti Ransomware Hacking Spree Breaches Over 40 Orgs in a Month

Bleeping Computer: Conti is a cybercrime syndicate that runs one of the most aggressive ransomware campaigns. It has become highly organized to the point where affiliates were able to hack more than 40 primarily US-based businesses in just over a month.

Security researchers identified the hacking campaign as “ARMattack” and said it was one of the group’s most productive and effective. ARMattack was also very fast, considering how quickly the group compromised the networks. Additionally, the ransom requested by the attacker is unknown, nor do we know if any victims paid it.

Bleeping Computer also claims Conti is currently the third most frequent ransomware gang in terms of attack frequency.

The number of victims who have not paid Conti ransoms increased to 859; however, this count is based only on publicly available data on the group’s leak site and is probably higher.

This number shows that Conti has published data from at least 35 organizations that did not pay ransom each month.

Insecure By Design: 56 Vulnerabilities Discovered in OT Products

Dark Reading: A new analysis of data from multiple sources has uncovered 56 vulnerabilities in Operational Technology (OT) products from 10 vendors, including notable ones such as Honeywell, Siemens, and Emerson.

These security issues are collectively called OT.ICEFALL. They stem from insecure cryptographic implementations, weak authentication schemes or weak cryptographic implementations, insecure firmware updates mechanisms and improperly protected native functionality, which hackers can use for remote code execution. CSO Online reports that 14% of the vulnerabilities could lead to remote code execution, and 21% could allow for firmware manipulation.

The problem stems from device vendors not including basic security features like encryption and authentication. Plus, these vulnerable devices are often installed in older products that their owners continue to use, even though there are better options. So now we have the element of false confidence as many vulnerable products have been subject to an audit and are now certified as safe for OT networks.

Researchers compared their findings with those from Project Basecamp, conducted ten years ago. Then as now, they focused on insecure-by design problems in remote terminal units (RTUs), programable logic controllers (PLCs), and other controllers in SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) used in industrial installations.

The bottom line: the vulnerabilities are still present.

In Case You Missed It

Enhance Security and Control Access to Critical Assets with Network Segmentation – Ajay Uggirala

Office Documents are Still Not Safe for Cybersecurity – Ray Wyman

Three Keys to Modern Cyberdefense: Affordability, Availability, Efficacy – Amber Wolff

BEC Attacks: Can You Stop the Imposters in Your Inbox? – Ken Dang

SonicWall CEO Bill Conner Selected as SC Media Excellence Award Finalist – Bret Fitzgerald

Cybersecurity in the Fifth Industrial Revolution – Ray Wyman

What is Cryptojacking, and how does it affect your Cybersecurity? – Ray Wyman

Why Healthcare Must Do More (and Do Better) to Ensure Patient Safety – Ken Dang

SonicWall Recognizes Partners, Distributors for Outstanding Performance in 2021 – Terry Greer-King

Anti-Ransomware Day: What Can We Do to Prevent the Next WannaCry? – Amber Wolff

CRN Recognizes Three SonicWall Employees on 2022 Women of the Channel List – Bret Fitzgerald

Enjoy the Speed and Safety of TLS 1.3 Support – Amber Wolff

Four Cybersecurity Actions to Lock it All Down – Ray Wyman

Understanding the MITRE ATT&CK Framework and Evaluations – Part 2 – Suroop Chandran

Five Times Flawless: SonicWall Earns Its Fifth Perfect Score from ICSA Labs – Amber Wolff

NSv Virtual Firewall: Tested and Certified in AWS Public Cloud – Ajay Uggirala

How SonicWall’s Supply-Chain Strategies Are Slicing Wait Times – Amber Wolff

SonicWall SMA 1000 Series Earns Best-Of Enterprise VPNs Award from Expert Insights – Bret Fitzgerald

World Backup Day: Because Real Life Can Have Save Points Too – Amber Wolff

CRN Honors SonicWall With 5-Star Rating in 2022 Partner Program Guide – Bret Fitzgerald

Cyberattacks on Government Skyrocketed in 2021 – Amber Wolff

Meeting the Cybersecurity Needs of the Hybrid Workforce – Ray Wyman

Third-Party ICSA Testing – Perfect Score Number 4 – Kayvon Sadeghi

Ransomware is Everywhere – Amber Wolff

Shields Up: Preparing for Cyberattacks During Ukraine Crisis – Aria Eslambolchizadeh

Enhance Security and Control Access to Critical Assets with Network Segmentation

Before COVID-19, most corporate employees worked in offices, using computers connected to the internal network. Once users connected to these internal networks, they typically had access to all the data and applications without many restrictions. Network architects designed flat internal networks where the devices in the network connected with each other directly or through a router or a switch.

But while flat networks are fast to implement and have fewer bottlenecks, they’re extremely vulnerable — once compromised, attackers are free to move laterally across the internal network.

Designing flat networks at a time when all the trusted users were on the internal networks might have been simpler and more efficient. But times have changed: Today, 55% of those surveyed say they work more hours remotely than at the physical office. Due to the rapid evolution of the way we work, corporations must now contend with:

  • Multiple network perimeters at headquarters, in remote offices and in the cloud
  • Applications and data scattered across different cloud platforms and data centers
  • Users who expect the same level of access to internal networks while working remotely

While this is a complex set of issues, there is a solution. Network segmentation, when implemented properly, can unflatten the network, allowing security admins to compartmentalize internal networks and provide granular user access.

What is network segmentation?

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) offers the following definition for network segmentation: “Splitting a network into sub-networks; for example, by creating separate areas on the network which are protected by firewalls configured to reject unnecessary traffic. Network segmentation minimizes the harm of malware and other threats by isolating it to a limited part of the network.”

The main principle of segmentation is making sure that each segment is protected from the other, so that if a breach does occur, it is limited to only a portion of the network. Segmentation should be applied to all entities in the IT environment, including users, workloads, physical servers, virtual machines, containers, network devices and endpoints.

Connections between these entities should be allowed only after their identities have been verified and proper access rights have been established. The approach of segmenting with granular and dynamic access is also known as Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA).

As shown in Figure 1, instead of a network with a single perimeter, inside which entities across the network are freely accessible, a segmented network environment features smaller network zones with firewalls separating them.

Achieving network segmentation

Implementing segmentation may seem complex, and figuring out the right place to start might seem intimidating. But by following these steps, it can be achieved rather painlessly.

1. Understand and Visualize

Network admins need to map all the subnets and virtual local area networks (VLANs) on the corporate networks. Visualizing the current environment provides a lot of value right away in understanding both how to and what to segment.

At this step, network and security teams also need to work together to see where security devices such as firewalls, IPS and network access controls are deployed in the corporate network. An accurate map of the network and a complete inventory of security systems will help tremendously in creating efficient segments.

2. Segment and Create Policies

The next step in the process is to create the segments themselves: Large subnets or zones should be segmented, monitored and protected with granular access policies. Segments can be configured based on a variety of categories, including geo-location, corporate departments, server farms, data centers and cloud platforms.

After defining segments, create security policies and access-control rules between those segments. These polices can be created and managed using firewalls, VLANs or secure mobile access devices. In most cases, security admins can simply use existing firewalls or secure mobile access solutions to segment and create granular policies. It’s best for administrators to ensure that segments and policies are aligned with business processes.

3. Monitor and Enforce Policies

After creating segments and policies, take some time to monitor the traffic patterns between those segments. The first time the security policies are enforced, it may cause disruption to regular business functions. So it’s best to apply policies in non-blocking or alert mode and monitor for false positives or other network errors.

Next, it’s the time to enforce policies. Once the individual policies are pushed, each segment is protected from cyber attackers’ lateral movements and from internal users trying to reach resources they are not authorized to use. It’s a good idea to continuously monitor and apply new policies as needed whenever there are changes to networks, applications or user roles.

Policy-based segmentation: A way forward for distributed networks

What today’s enterprises require is a way to deliver granular policy enforcement to multiple segments within the network. Through segmentation, companies can protect critical digital assets against any lateral attacks and provide secure access to remote workforces.

The good news is that, with the power and flexibility of a next-generation firewall (NGFW) and with other technologies such as secure mobile access and ZTNA solutions, enterprises can safeguard today’s distributed networks by enforcing policy-based segmentation.

SonicWall’s award-winning hardware and advanced technologies include NGFWs, Secure Mobile Access and Cloud Edge Secure Access. These solutions are designed to allow any network— from small businesses to large enterprises, from the datacenter to the cloud — to segment and achieve greater protection with SonicWall.

Learn more about how segmenting your network can help you enhance security and control access to your organization’s critical assets.

Vacron Network Video Recorder Remote Command Execution

SonicWall Capture Labs threat research team observed attacks exploiting old vulnerability in Vacron NVR.

Network video recorders (NVRs) are IP-based appliances that are built for managing cameras, recording and viewing camera feeds at a site. NVRs are usually PC-grade or low-end server systems made using commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) hardware components. They typically contain an embedded operating system or a client operating system that hosts video management software, which provides users a mechanism to view, record and manage camera feeds. Vacron sells NVRs as well as other products.

Vacron NVR Remote Command Execution Vulnerability

The goal of command injection  attack  is the execution of arbitrary commands on the host operating system via a vulnerable application. Command injection attacks are possible when an application passes unsafe user-supplied data (forms, cookies, HTTP headers etc.) to a system shell. In this attack, the attacker-supplied operating system commands are usually executed with the privileges of the vulnerable application.

The remote Vacron network video recorder is affected by a remote command execution vulnerability due to improper sanitization of user-supplied input passed via /board.cgi.

Following are some of the exploits found in the wild:

As one can see the vulnerable /board.cgi cannot properly sanitize the input. This allows the attacker to inject and execute the commands to change the directory and download malicious script from the attacker-controlled server.

SonicWall Capture Labs provides protection against this threat via following signatures:

      • IPS 13033:Vacron NVR Remote Command Execution
      • GAV: Linux.Mirai.N_2

IoCs

    • 222.138.188.211
    • 103.181.56.61
    • 125.44.20.51
    • 175.107.0.212
    • 3a43d007ed5ff84d4b71f96a49c88fe0061a2a9651935a82d4acbf55982fc370

Threat Graph

Android Malware impersonates Google Update Application with old traits

SonicWall Capture Labs Threats Research team has been regularly sharing information about malwares including spyware targeting Android devices. SonicWall has tracked down a huge number of fake applications disguised as legitimate Google update applications.

Fig 1. Fake Google Update applications

 

The new version of the spyware is recently available on malware-sharing platforms like VirusTotal.

Fig 2. VirusTotal submission history

 

Infection Cycle:

Most of the fake malicious google updater apps have some common activities of spyware and a few of them work as banking trojan as well.

After installation, the apps ask for Accessibility permission and then hide from the app drawer.

 

Fig 3: App Installation & Accessibility permission

 

It accesses the following activities on the device and tracked information is saved in the corresponding .json file and establishes a socket connection with C&C server “help.domainoutlet.site” and shares the device information in JSON file.

  • SMS
  • Call logs
  • Call Recording
  • Device Info
  • Location
  • Keyloggers
  • Device Contact
  • Notification

Fig 4: Storing contact details in JSON file

 

In some cases, along with spyware activities it also acts as a Banking Trojan, like SHA-256 fb3837dc602c3f51939891b75a34d706bbefa73f822cffffeb1b863a6526bf95 .

Dex file is dynamically loaded which contains the malicious banking trojan code.

Fig 5: Load Dex file

 

It checks for installed applications and compares them against specific package names preferably banking and Cryptocurrency apps (350+ apps). Once it determines that one of these apps is being used, it can carry out an overlay attack. In order to carry out an overlay attack, it places fake page over legitimate apps which looks similar to steal credentials.

Fig 6: Checking installed apps

 

Fig 7 : Load WebView for overlay attack

 

Fig 8: List of targeted apps

 

SonicWall Capture Labs provides protection against this threat via the SonicWall Capture ATP w/RTDMI.

 

Indicators of Compromise (IOC):

01d0e1996d0ba3ff4e0bac4747b0e0d955fe93ac3cca62caebc46dfd4f4b811f

1ac57a4bc06ebdd42ffed1d63e7731eade4a58c302641f3373f2a42298e461e2

299c10f9f438b8176b8f49654952d9189ddcf3b9e44e834c54db7410ac2af9f1

417ebc3a1dcc71f76d67b97adffd239399110b18eb644ef0da74061c7d569ef7

421f4aeedfec86eb756ac9acbb55014d973f2aa7136718cfd93829944998878a

65c9fd0fb77c08319ff8047f7c9302da843f8dcea9a8bad482850c9e3bd545cf

6a31addaad870460f0713fe057cb7a47fffe426f2217dcb2e0167b4257f356c0

763dc2a295d95ed24e2f9081ff192d079f9d6837f8e6ad15f6453542dd0c2ab9

85a710df11765d424f367abcbb61b70bbc42ef1969e7fd59968c784a8b5937da

8a15e9deb145e90cff2bf414842221afc04494c90d0a8af7e059e2273f661934

9d6ee58c17c62ef5ff8d586a6bea437dbaa856a0ac96c8e425063a55e23d6b11

c56862b2de6d04d15bc11f1dffed108099a3f0c92098383774580eadd551fc82

c745c5c4032e6b6036e25d1efad8f30470aee99f368a923509f570310e5d2644

cc8db772726e5d3d4ec680cd53587d79592c7a5a83148ff5b5ec0b7b7ce1781c

fb3837dc602c3f51939891b75a34d706bbefa73f822cffffeb1b863a6526bf95

 

Office Documents are Still Not Safe for Cybersecurity

Emotet is back. Word, Excel and other Office 365 files are still a critical cyberthreat vector. How do we stop it?

Although it was almost a week late, Tom finally received the pricing proposal from Tetome Supply.

He was excited to begin reviewing it. However, he knew from the quarterly cybersecurity courses that he should be cautious. So he carefully studied the email address and name of the sender and made sure that the attachment was a Word document and not a .exe file. He was further reassured by the email’s text, in which the sender thanked him for being patient and inquired about his new puppy.

Tom was sipping his morning coffee as he scanned the headlines from the day on his smartphone. A message appeared on the monitor informing Tom that the .doc had been created in iOS and that he must enable editing and content. Finally, he could see the contents of his document, but it also set off a chain reaction.

As far as Tom knew, the document only contained the pricing information. Nothing indicated that Emotet was downloaded from a compromised website by a Powershell command. Or that Trickbot had been used to backup Emotet.

It was too late. When Tom opened his laptop a few days later, a note informed him that all his files were encrypted and that the hackers would not unlock them until Tom paid $150,000 in bitcoin. The note was signed by Ryuk.

No time for a sigh of relief.

For the first half of 2019, malicious PDFs showed an edge over malicious Office 365 files, outpacing them 36,488 to 25,461. Then in 2020, the number of PDFs dipped 8% over the same period in 2019 while the number of malicious Microsoft Office files skyrocketed to 70,184 — a 176% increase.

Wired Magazine once labeled Emotet the most dangerous malware in the entire world. So no surprise that back in January 2021, law enforcement from every major country launched a massive effort to disrupt Emotet’s infrastructure found embedded in servers and computers in more than 90 countries. The effort resulted in the arrest of criminals and confiscation of equipment, cash, and even rows of gold bars accumulated by the gangs.

Indeed, utilization of Microsoft Office files in attacks fell. According to the 2022 SonicWall Cyber Threat Report, PDFs returned as the preferred attack vector with a 52% increase in malicious utilization and malicious Microsoft Office files decreased by 64%. This trend was a marked reversal and yet, there was no time for even a sigh of relief.

A graph showing the rise of never-seen-before malware variants.

Emotet attacks are back.

According to recent reports by Bleeping ComputerThreatpost and the Sans Technology Institute, within 10 months since the high-profile January 2021 takedown, Emotet is back with a vengeance. Threat actors are actively distributing infected Microsoft Office documents, ZIP archives and other files laden with Emotet code.

While it is still too early to see a data trend, anecdotally we see significant changes such as encryption of malware assets and new strategy that includes targeted phishing attacks that include reply-chain emails, shipping notices, tax documents, accounting reports or even holiday party invites.

In less than 10 months, previous eradication efforts were erased and now we’re back to square one.

How to protect from malicious Office 365 files.

Even with serious threats on the fly, there are several simple things you can do to protect yourself and others on your network. You can start by changing your Office 365 settings to disable scripts and macros and keeping your endpoints and operating system up to date with the latest patches for Windows.

You can set a business policy not to transfer documents and other files via email. You can also keep up with Microsoft’s regular distribution of patches and updates. We all get busy, but when we let our updates lapse, we’re literally allowing attacks targeting these vulnerabilities to succeed.

We can also take stronger steps to strengthen our resistance to attack. 2021 was another banner year for SonicWall’s patented Real-Time Deep Memory Inspection™ (RTDMI) technology which detected 442,151 total never-before-seen malware variants in 2021, a 65% increase over 2020’s count and an average of 1,211 per day.

A graph showing new malicious file type detections in 2021.

Capture ATP, 100% Captures, and 0% False Positives.

The best part about RTDMI is that it is integrated with SonicWall’s Capture Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). And in quarterly third-party testing by ICSA Labs, RTDMI identified 100% malicious threats without posting a single false positive for five quarters in a row.

Capture ATP with RTDMI leverages proprietary memory inspection, CPU instruction tracking and machine learning capabilities to recognize and mitigate never-before-seen cyberattacks, including threats that do not exhibit any malicious behavior and hide their weaponry via encryption — attacks that traditional sandboxes will likely miss.

This is particularly important in cases such as Tom’s, as Trickbot and Emotet both use encryption to hide their misdeeds. Emotet can also determine whether it’s running inside a virtual machine (VM) and will remain dormant if it detects a sandbox environment.

Three Keys to Modern Cyberdefense: Affordability, Availability, Efficacy

(Our previous supply-chain updates can be found here and here.)

If you’ve ever been to a small-town mechanic, chances are you’ve seen the sign: “We offer three types of service here — Good, Fast and Cheap. Pick any two!”

In cybersecurity, this can be framed as “Affordability, Availability and Efficacy,” but the idea is the same — when making your choice, something’s got to give.

The effects of this mentality are sending ripples across the cybersecurity industry. At the 2022 RSA Conference, Joe Hubback of cyber risk management firm ISTARI explained that based on his survey, a full 90% of CISOs, CIOs, government organizations and more reported they aren’t getting the efficacy promised by vendors.

Several reasons for this were discussed, but most came back to this idea of compromise —buyers want products now, and they’re facing budget constraints. So, they often believe the vendors’ claims (which tend to be exaggerated). With little actual evidence or confirmation for these claims available, and little time to evaluate these solutions for themselves, customers are left disappointed.

To make the buying process more transparent and objective, Hubback says, vendor solutions should be evaluated in terms of Capability, Practicality, Quality and Provenance. While his presentation didn’t reference the Affordability-Availability-Efficacy trifecta directly, these ideas are interconnected — and regardless of whether you use either metric or both, SonicWall comes out ahead.

Availability: Supply-Chain Constraints and Lack of Inventory

Order and install times have always been a consideration. But the current climate has led to a paradox in modern cybersecurity: With cyberattack surfaces widening and cybercrime rising, you really ought to have upgraded yesterday. But in many cases, the components you need won’t be in stock for several months.

While many customers are being locked into high-dollar contracts and then being forced to wait for inventory, this isn’t true for SonicWall customers: Our supply chain is fully operational and ready to safeguard your organization.

SonicWall is currently fulfilling 95% of orders within three days.

Procurement Planning & Forecasting

“We’re hearing more often than not that our competitors don’t have the product on the shelf, but we’ve been managing this for over two years,” SonicWall Executive Vice President of Operations Yew-Joo Hoe said.

In autumn of 2020, as lead times began to creep up, SonicWall’s operations department immediately began altering internal processes, changing the way it works with suppliers and ships goods, and even re-engineering some products to deliver the same performance with more readily available components.

So now, even amid remarkable growth — 2021 saw a 33% increase in new customer growth, along with a 45% rise in new customer sales — SonicWall is currently fulfilling 95% of orders within three days.

But even as we’ve zeroed in on supply-chain continuity, our dedication to the Provenance of our supply chain has been unwavering. We aim to secure, connect and mobilize organizations operating within approved or authorized regions, territories and countries by ensuring the integrity of our supply chain from start to finish.

SonicWall products are also compliant with the Trade Agreements Act in the U.S., and our practices help ensure SonicWall products aren’t compromised by third parties during the manufacturing process.

Affordability: The Two Facets of TCO

SonicWall’s goal is to deliver industry-leading TCO. But this is more than a marketing message for us — we put it to the test.

SonicWall recently commissioned the Tolly Group to evaluate the SonicWall NSsp 13700, the NSsp 15700, the NSa 2700 and more against equivalent competitor products. Each time, the SonicWall product was named the better value, saving customers thousands, tens of thousands and even hundreds of thousands while delivering superior threat protection.

But we also recognize that the measure of a product’s affordability extends beyond the number on an order sheet, to how much labor that solution requires. Hubback summarized the idea of Practicality as “Is this actually something I can use in my company without needing some kind of Top Gun pilot to fly it and make it work?” With cybersecurity professionals getting harder to find, and their experience becoming more expensive every day, the ideas of Practicality and Affordability have never been so intertwined.

Fortunately, SonicWall has long recognized this association, and we’ve built our products to reduce both the amount of human intervention and the required skill level needed to run our solutions.

Innovations such as Zero-Touch Deployment, cloud-based management, single-pane-of-glass interfaces, simplified policy creation and management, and one-click rollback in the event of a breach have brought increased simplicity to our portfolio without sacrificing performance or flexibility.

Efficacy: How It’s Built and How It Performs

Hubback’s final two criteria, Quality and Capability, describe how well a solution is built, and how well it can do what it promises. Taken together, these form the core of what we think of as Efficacy.

While Quality is the most enigmatic of Hubback’s criteria, it can be reasonably ascertained based on a handful of factors, such as longevity, customer satisfaction and growth.

With over 30 years of experience, SonicWall is a veteran cybersecurity leader trusted by SMBs, enterprises and government agencies around the globe. In the crowded cybersecurity market, this sort of longevity isn’t possible without quality offerings — and our quantity of repeat purchasers and scores of customer case studies attest to the high standards we maintain for every solution we build.

In contrast, Capability can be very easy to judge — if a vendor chooses to put its products to the test. Independent, third-party evaluation is the gold standard for determining whether products live up to their promises. And based on this metric, SonicWall comes out on top.

To provide customers objective information about its performance, SonicWall Capture ATP with RTDMI has been evaluated by third-party testing firm ICSA Labs, an independent division of Verizon. For the past seven consecutive quarters, the solution has found 100% of the threats while issuing only a single false positive. SonicWall has now earned more perfect scores — and more back-to-back perfect scores — than any other active vendor.

Today, thousands of organizations will shop for new or upgraded cybersecurity solutions. While they may differ in size, industry, use case and more, at the end of the day, they’re all looking for basically the same thing: A reliable solution that performs as advertised, at a price that fits within their budget, that can be up and running as soon as possible.

There will always be those who tell you that you can’t have everything; that the center of this Venn diagram will always be empty. But at SonicWall, we refuse to compromise — and we think you should, too.

Info Stealers are leveraging betting apps ban over Google Play store

SonicWall Capture Labs Threats Research team has been regularly sharing information about malware threats targeting Android devices. Recently we have observed some fake fantasy league betting applications in the wild.

Google Play store banned all the gambling and sports betting applications but since March 2021 an update in their policies for online gaming ban was lifted in 19 countries while they use external third-party platforms in the rest of the other places.

In India, more than 25 fantasy apps are available, with an app named “Dream11” being the most popular and whose download count reached more than 130 million as per their official website.

As these apps are not present in the Google Play store malware authors are leveraging this fact to host fake malicious apps which look like genuine apps.

Infection cycle:

Once installed on the device, Dream11 application uses the following icons:

 

Fig 1: Malicious App icon

 

Fig 2: Showing the correct match schedule

Once executed it displays a page showing the match schedule as in Figure 2 above, however the app does not respond after this page. During our static investigation, we observed that it performs several malicious activities:

  • Receives commands via SMS
  • Reads and sends SMS
  • Reads and deletes contacts
  • Accesses call log (incoming, outgoing & missed calls)
  • Tracks location
  • Records audio
  • Logs keystrokes
  • Camera Access

 

Fig 3: Reads SMS and Executes command accordingly

Fig 4: Commands Received

Fig 5: Sent SMS

Fig 6: Call log Access

 

Fig 7: Deletes contact details

 

Fig 8: Audio record

Fig 9: Access device Location

Fig 10: Config file

Fig 11: Sending user info using socket connection

We urge our users to always be vigilant and cautious when installing software programs particularly if you are not certain of the source.

SonicWall Capture Labs provides protection against this threat via the following signature:

  • GAV: AndroidOS.Fakeapp.FL 

This threat is also detected by SonicWALL Capture ATP w/RTDMI and the Capture Client endpoint solutions.

 

Indicators of Compromise (IOC):

2ecd9211817021f8a3f3e1f4ad0bf1b7a98b0d82

0a55255e35390f3fed3cd333e0873f0054ff7827

 

 

 

HTML Application (.HTA) files are being used to distribute Smoke Loader malware

Threat actor always targets under the radar file types to deliver malware to the victim’s machine. HTML Applications (HTA) files are known as less suspicious file types by various security providers. SonicWall Capture Labs Threat Research team has observed an HTA file inside an archive is being delivered to the victim’s machine, which further downloads and executes Smoke Loader malware.

 

Infection Cycle:

The archive file name is in German “Zahlungserinnerung-BV-Green-Golfm.zip” acted as a payment reminder for the victim. The HTA file has HTML code to display service estimation by “LM Classic Cars” for Ferrari 348 TB for an Autria customer, additionally it includes JavaScript code to download malware using PowerShell script:

 

The JavaScript code executes the PowerShell executable which further executes another instance of the PowerShell executable using Command Prompt:

 

The PowerShell script contains code to perform below actions on MS Office files:

  • Enables all macros
  • Disable protected view for files belongs to internet zone
  • Disable protected view for attachments opened in Outlook
  • Disable protected view for files in unsafe locations

The PowerShell downloads malware from URL h[t][t]p://www.trimm.at/error/upx.exe

 

The Smoke Loader malware works in multi stages and layers. It uses code obfuscation, anti debugging, anti VM and Living of The Land techniques. The malware makes sure that a memory dump should not expose its intention at any point of time.

 

First Stage Executable

The first stage executable is highly obfuscated, it contains large loops with garbage API calls followed by a conditional jump. The malware uses opaque predicate technique as control never goes to garbage API calls, they are just kept to make analysis difficult. In a long iterations loop, only few operations are actually required by the malware which are executed on a particular iteration. The below iteration loop is intended to calculate the encrypted bytes size at 0x40Ath iteration:

 

The malware decrypts the shellcode into memory which further brings second stage executable:

 

The shellcode uses PEB_LDR_DATA from Process Environment Block, iterates through InLoadOrderModuleList to get the API addresses. The shellcode decrypts next stage executable in memory and does process hollowing to replace current process from the address space and starts execution of new process from entry point:

 

Second Stage Executable:

Second stage executable code is full of techniques used to investigate the controlled environment execution.

Anti-Debug

Checking the BeingDebugged and NtGlobalFlag in Process Environment Block is common across the malware. Here the tricky part is, instead of branching the code based on the flag values, the malware uses the flag values to compute a jump offset. If the malware is running inside a debugger then it will compute a invalid address which makes an impression of corrupted file to the researcher:

 

 

On-Demand Decryption

The malware decrypts the code on demand just before executing it and once the code is executed, the malware encrypts it back. The malware does this, to prevent its complete code exposure in one shot:

Loaded module

The malware checks for below modules in the current process, if any of them is loaded malware terminates the execution.

  • sbiedll (Sandboxie module)
  • aswhook (Avast module)
  • snxhk (Avast module)

 

Virtual Environment

The malware examines registry values “\REGISTRY\MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Enum\IDE” and “\REGISTRY\MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Enum\SCSI” for below substrings to check for virtual environment.

  • qemu
  • virtio
  • vmware
  • vbox
  • xen

 

The malware enumerates through all the running processes and looks for below processes. If any of the process is found the malware terminates the execution. The malware shows laziness in the code here, instead of dynamic size for individual process name, the malware keeps the size to 0x20 bytes for all the process names:

  • qemu-ga.exe
  • qga.exe
  • windanr.exe
  • vboxservice.exe
  • vboxtray.exe
  • vmtoolsd.exe
  • prl_tools.exe

The malware looks for below 7 bytes substrings of filenames into victim’s machine. If any of them is found the malware terminates the execution:

  • vmci.s
  • vmusbm
  • vmmous
  • vm3dmp
  • vmrawd
  • vmmemc
  • vboxgu
  • vboxsf
  • vboxmo
  • vboxvi
  • vboxdi
  • vioser

Code Injection

The malware gets the explorer.exe process id using APIs GetShellWindow and GetWindowThreadProcessId:

The malware creates and maps two sections in explorer.exe, one section has PAGE_READWRITE access attributes to store data and second section has PAGE_EXECUTE_READ access attributes to inject shellcode. Not enabling WRITE access to the shellcode memory makes the debugging little more difficult as this will prevent from putting software breakpoints and modifying code as per researcher’s need:

 

The malware injects shellcode into the mapped section and does NtCreateThreadEx passing data section address as parameter:

 

ShellCode Execution:

The Injected shellcode into explorer.exe spawns two sub-threads which keep an eye on monitoring tools. If the researcher opens any of the monitoring tool or analysis tool that will be immediately terminated by the sub-threads while the main thread doing its job.

Thread 1

This thread enumerates through all running processes, computes hash of the running process name and compares it with its list of hashes to terminate below processes:

  • 56DAB1A9 → Autoruns.exe
  • F3E35F5E → procexp.exe
  • 2407724B → procexp64.exe
  • FBC25850 → procmon.exe
  • 27151A96 → procmon64.exe
  • E6ED4551 → Tcpview.exe
  • 27D7E006 → Wireshark.exe
  • 2CEB6C62 → ProcessHacker.exe
  • EDCD7F5E → ollydbg.exe
  • 70A30042 → x32dbg.exe
  • 4EA30D45 → x64dbg.exe
  • 0CCD4A10 → idaq.exe
  • 0CCD4C3A → idaw.exe
  • 0956AD95 → idaq64.exe
  • 337CAD95 → idaw64.exe

 

 

Thread 2

The malware enumerates through windows, computes hash value of windows name and compares it to terminate processes attached with below windows list:

  • 61C75CDC → Autoruns
  • 4DFA76EB → PROCEXPL
  • 95E8B472 → PROCMON_WINDOW_CLASS
  • 62DC4674 → TCPViewClass
  • 6A0FAA84 → Wireshark
  • 7FF991A1 → ProcessHacker
  • BEDA6295 → OLLYDBG
  • 62DD69FD → IDA

 

Main Thread

The main thread starts with Process Environment Block (PEB) traversal, to get ImageBase of ntdll.dll and kernel32.dll. The malware then enumerates the export functions to get the the addresses of required APIs. Instead of direct API names the malware keeps the hash values list, which is being compared to the hash value of the exported function name:

 

The malware keeps list of RC4 encrypted strings in a structure, in which first bytes tells the string size followed by encrypted string. The malware perform RC4 decryptions just before using them:

 

The malware computes a unique identifier for the victim’s machine using below formula:

MD5(computer name + hardcoded DWORD value + system drive serial number) +  system drive serial number

The malware creates mutex with the unique identifier to restrict execution of another instance of the shellcode and if another instance is already running malware terminates its execution:

 

The malware reads Internet Explorer version information from registry and gets user agent string for it:

 

The malware drops self copy into %APPDATA% directory and the file name is computed by encoding initial 7 bytes from the unique identifier:

 

The malware deletes the current instance of the malware and it deletes zone identifier from the self copy dropped in %APPDATA%:

 

The malware sets dropped file property as FILE_ATTRIBUTE_HIDDEN and FILE_ATTRIBUTE_SYSTEM. The malware steals creation time from advapi32.dll and mark the same creation time for the dropped file to avoid being red flagged from any of the security providers.

 

C&C Communication

The malware contains 4 C&C servers:

  • ostgotahusbilsuthynring.de
  • autoland-ls.de
  • autogalerieseud.de
  • autohuas-e-c.de

The malware calculate CRC32 checksum for one of the C&C server before communicating, to make sure that the C&C has not been modified by the researcher and if the C&C is modified malware terminates the execution. The malware prepares post data which includes the variant id, unique identifier for the victim’s machine, computer name and random 0xA1 bytes. The data is then encrypted by RC4 algorithm and sent to its C&C server:

 

At the time of analysis all 4 C&C server were not responding but digging deep into the malware code reveals that malware is expecting response from C&C server which should contain Variant ID (0x7E6), Plugin size and plugin modules.

 

Unavailability of the archive file in any of the popular threat intelligence sharing portals like the VirusTotal and the ReversingLabs indicates its uniqueness and limited distribution:

 

Evidence of detection by RTDMI ™ engine can be seen below in the Capture ATP report for this file:

Cybersecurity News & Trends

Stories about cybersecurity news and trends curated from major news outlets, trade pubs and infosec bloggers.

SonicWall news finishes a strong week with more mentions from the 2022 SonicWall Cyber Threat Report, bylines by our cybersecurity leaders, and quotes. And of course, Industry News was very busy. From DarkReading, we learn about the retiring Internet Explorer and how it (and the associated cyber risk) will linger for years. KrebsOnSecurity and SC Media report on ransomware attackers launching a searchable public database of their victims. SiliconValley News reports on the 9-year jail sentence earned by the infamous hacker who stole millions of private images from iCloud. From Reuters, hackers managed to crash the Russian Davos event and (temporarily) stop President Vladimir Putin from speaking. In the New Zealand Herald, the story about how a spelling error saved a man from Perth $6M. And finally, our big read for the week on the successful dismantling of a huge Russian Botnet, compiled from the US Department of JusticeBloomberg LawPolitico, and Forbes.

Remember, cybersecurity is everyone’s business. Be safe out there!

SonicWall News

Contractors Beset by Ransomware Threats Have Too Few Options

Bloomberg Law, Bill Conner Quote: The contracting community is aware of the confusion. Chester Wisniewski at Sophos, Carolyn Crandall at SentinelOne, and Bill Conner at SonicWall all outlined suggestions to Bloomberg Government in a series of interviews. Conner, SonicWall’s president and CEO, said he wants the government to install so-called “cyber czars” at each federal agency to better streamline communication.

SonicWall Recognizes APAC Partners and Distributors at FY2022 Partner Awards

Channel Life (Australia), SonicWall News: SonicWall has recognized its distributors and partners for their efforts in producing the company’s most successful year to date. The recent SonicWall FY2022 Partner Awards recognized companies for their commitment to demonstrating excellence, innovation and leadership in cybersecurity during the fiscal year. They are also thanked for continuing to drive digital transformation for businesses that leverage SonicWall solutions.

The Powerful Cyberattack That Has America on Alert

Swiss Info (Deutsch), SonicWall Threat Report Mention: The Cyber Threat Report 2022 of the US firm SonicWall, shows a rebound of 105% in data hijacking last year, surpassing 623 million attacks worldwide – almost twenty attempts per second – with the United States in the lead (421 million or 67.5% of the total).

SonicWall Awards Top Partners for FY22

ARN (Australia), SonicWall News: Cyber security vendor SonicWall has awarded its top-performing partners for its 2022 fiscal year ending 31 January.

The Cybersecurity Challenges of Remote Working and How a Brand Can Eliminate Them

E Business (UK), SonicWall Mention: SonicWall provides trusted solutions delivering wireless, switches, firewalls, and CCTV that can keep businesses safe from an attack and avoid downtime.

Best Practices for Protecting Against Phishing, Ransomware and Email Fraud

CXOtoday (India), SonicWall Byline: Security teams and the organizations they support live in difficult times: they increasingly are the targets of sophisticated threats developed by a shadowy and very well financed cybercrime industry that has demonstrated it can often outsmart even the most robust security defenses.

Dicker Data, Hitech Support, Next Telecom, Datacom score SonicWall Honors

CRN (Australia), SonicWall News: “SonicWall has awarded Australian partners Dicker Data, Hitech Support, Next Telecom, Datacom System and Dell Australia for their work at its Asia-Pacific Partner Awards for the 2022 financial year.”

What is a Cyberattack? Types and Defenses

eSecurity Planet, SonicWall Threat Report Mention: Driven by the global pandemic, the increase in remote and hybrid work, and unprepared network defenses, cyberattacks have been rising exponentially. The 2022 SonicWall Cyber Threat Report found that all types of cyberattacks increased in 2021. Encrypted threats spiked 167%, ransomware increased 105%, and 5.4 billion malware attacks were identified by the report.

Ransomware, the Cyberattack That Set Off Alarms in Latin America

Forbes Colombia, SonicWall Threat Report Mention: The Cyber Threat Report 2022 of the US firm SonicWall, shows a rebound of 105% in data hijacking last year, surpassing 623 million attacks worldwide – almost twenty attempts per second – with the United States in the lead (421 million or 67.5% of the total).

Industry News

Internet Explorer Is Now Retired but Remains an Attack Target

DarkReading: Microsoft’s June 15th official end-of-support for Internet Explorer 11 desktop software has left behind a browser that has been around for almost 27 years. Even so, IE will likely remain a lucrative target for attackers.

Despite Microsoft’s long-standing plans to discontinue Internet Explorer (IE), some organizations continue to use it. Microsoft has maintained the MSHTML (aka Trident), IE browser engine in Windows 11 through 2029. This allows organizations to continue to use IE mode while transitioning to Microsoft Edge. So IE is not dead yet.

Although IE is typically a minor player in the global browser market (0.52%), many companies use it internally or have legacy applications tied to IE. This week, Nikkei Asia stories and Japan Times cited a Keyman’s Net survey showing that almost 49% of 350 Japanese companies surveyed use IE daily. Likewise, South Korea’s MBN indicated that many large organizations are still using IE and will likely continue using it for the foreseeable future.

Ransomware Group Launches Searchable Victim Data

KrebsOnSecurity – Cybercriminals that target corporate data theft and demand ransoms to keep it from being published have tried many methods to shame victims into paying. The ALPHV ransomware group, also known as “BlackCat,” has made the gambit harder and harder to avoid.

They previously tried publishing victim data in repositories on the Dark Web. Now they’re going big with a new public website to post their booty on individual victims. And they’re inviting the public to search the leaked data.

ALPHV announced its new victim-shaming website that they had hacked a luxury resort and spa in the western United States. The database of shame includes the personal data of more than 1,500 resort employees and 2,500 resort residents. In addition, the page’s top has two buttons that allow guests to “Check Yourself” – one for employees and the other for guests.

SC Media also reported that their security expert described the site as “kinda like a bad guy’s version of HaveIBeenPwned,” with the main difference being that data on HaveIBeenPwned is anonymized. ALPHV displays all, including full names, dates, expenditures, and other personal data, including email addresses, birthdays, and social security numbers.

SC Media and KrebsOnSecurity chose not to reveal the hotel’s name to protect their personal information. The whole point of the ALPHV website is to pressure the hotel for payment.

Hacker Sentenced to 9 Years for Hacking Apple iCloud and Stealing Private Images

SiliconValley: Nine years of federal imprisonment have been given to a Californian man accused of hacking Apple iCloud and stealing private images and videos of young women, some nude and some engaged in personal activities.

According to court records, Hao Kuo Chi, 41, from La Puente in California, was sentenced Wednesday at a federal court in Tampa, Florida. According to court records, he pleaded guilty to three counts of computer fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit computer crime last October.

Chi also ran a notorious website Anon-IB for many years, where users posted images labeled as “revenge porn.” Officials claim that Chi hacked into victims’ Apple iCloud accounts to steal their private photos and videos. They also said he shared and traded the images with other users on AnonIB.

Chi’s email accounts contained the iCloud credentials for approximately 4,700 victims and had collected enough media to fill 3.5 terabytes on iCloud and physical storage devices.

Court testimony reveals that he shared stolen content with conspirators over 300 times. While some conspirators publicly released the images, he kept some of the images for himself connected to 500 victims.

Hackers Crash “Russian Davos” and Stops Putin’s Speech

Reuters: Hackers impeded President Putin’s speech at Russia’s top economic forum last Friday. This happened as Russia worked to adjust to its “new reality.” The meeting was already struggling due to a lack of Western participation. Nevertheless, the 25th St Petersburg International Economic Forum was attended by many state companies, with many stalls featuring floor-to-ceiling display screens and glamorous attendants.

Dmitry Peskov, a spokesperson for the Kremlin, stated that a denial-of-service attack (which involves flooding servers with fake traffic) had caused the forum’s admission and accreditation systems to be hampered. Although he did not blame the incident on the ongoing war in Ukraine, reporters noted that it was unofficially suspected.

Spelling Mistake Stops Perth Man’s $6m Fortune from Being Stolen by BEC Hackers

NZ Herald: This story illustrates how cybersecurity is everyone’s business. A Perth businessman almost lost $6 million to hackers, but one misspelled word saved him from watching his fortune falling into the wrong hands.

He was at the end of a multimillion-dollar property settlement with a trusted buyer. But unfortunately, the other party’s business email account in the deal was compromised by cybercriminals. The hackers intercepted the emails and changed the bank account details to their accounts.

An entry-level employee noticed that the word “group” was misspelled as “gruop.” After her timely alert, an inspection revealed that the business email account was compromised, and the bankers stopped the transaction just in time.

Also see “BEC – Business Email Compromise

US and Global Law Enforcement Partners Dismantle Russian Botnet

Multiple Sources: According to the US Department of Justice, US cybersecurity agents worked with law enforcement partners from the UK, Netherlands and Germany to dismantle the infrastructure of a Russian botnet called RSOCKS that hacked into millions of computers around the globe.

A botnet is an internet-connected group of devices that have been hacked and are controlled by attackers. They are often used to commit malicious acts. Each device connected to the internet has an Internet Protocol (IP) address.

Bloomberg Law provides additional details that the Botnet targeted IoT devices like clocks, routers and streaming devices. Hackers used these compromised devices as proxy servers to allow paying customers to access the compromised devices’ IP addresses and launch attacks. According to Bloomberg, the group’s Twitter account claimed access to more than eight million residential IPs and more than a million mobile IPs.

Politico reported that proxy services, which aren’t inherently illegal, provide IP addresses for their clients for a fee. However, the service includes bypassing censorship and accessing geo-blocked for a specific region. Prosecutors claim that RSOCKS was hacking into millions of devices using brute force attacks.

Customers could visit a web-based storefront to rent proxies for a specified period. Additionally, the customer could download a list of IP addresses and ports associated with the Botnet’s backend server and route malicious internet traffic through these compromised devices while hiding the source.

A related story by Forbes states that the Botnet was the home of a darknet market called Hydra Market. The marketplace’s closure is linked to subsequent seizures, including a superyacht owned by Viktor Vekselberg and $5.4M cash from Konstantin Malofeyev. The US DOJ identified Malofeyev as a Russian oligarch who attempted to use the Botnet services to circumvent sanctions.

In Case You Missed It

BEC Attacks: Can You Stop the Imposters in Your Inbox? – Ken Dang

SonicWall CEO Bill Conner Selected as SC Media Excellence Award Finalist – Bret Fitzgerald

Cybersecurity in the Fifth Industrial Revolution – Ray Wyman

What is Cryptojacking, and how does it affect your Cybersecurity? – Ray Wyman

Why Healthcare Must Do More (and Do Better) to Ensure Patient Safety – Ken Dang

SonicWall Recognizes Partners, Distributors for Outstanding Performance in 2021 – Terry Greer-King

Anti-Ransomware Day: What Can We Do to Prevent the Next WannaCry? – Amber Wolff

CRN Recognizes Three SonicWall Employees on 2022 Women of the Channel List – Bret Fitzgerald

Enjoy the Speed and Safety of TLS 1.3 Support – Amber Wolff

Four Cybersecurity Actions to Lock it All Down – Ray Wyman

Understanding the MITRE ATT&CK Framework and Evaluations – Part 2 – Suroop Chandran

Five Times Flawless: SonicWall Earns Its Fifth Perfect Score from ICSA Labs – Amber Wolff

NSv Virtual Firewall: Tested and Certified in AWS Public Cloud – Ajay Uggirala

How SonicWall’s Supply-Chain Strategies Are Slicing Wait Times – Amber Wolff

SonicWall SMA 1000 Series Earns Best-Of Enterprise VPNs Award from Expert Insights – Bret Fitzgerald

World Backup Day: Because Real Life Can Have Save Points Too – Amber Wolff

CRN Honors SonicWall With 5-Star Rating in 2022 Partner Program Guide – Bret Fitzgerald

Cyberattacks on Government Skyrocketed in 2021 – Amber Wolff

Meeting the Cybersecurity Needs of the Hybrid Workforce – Ray Wyman

Third-Party ICSA Testing – Perfect Score Number 4 – Kayvon Sadeghi

Ransomware is Everywhere – Amber Wolff

Shields Up: Preparing for Cyberattacks During Ukraine Crisis – Aria Eslambolchizadeh